Synergetics as a Systems Theoretical and Methodological Lens in Structuring Energy Poverty
Corresponding Author
Patman Inda
Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorJörg Lalk
Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Patman Inda
Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorJörg Lalk
Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Energy poverty, as part of the energy trilemma, remains a global challenge in the 21st century. More than 1.7 billion people remain without access to modern energy sources while more than 3 billion people rely only on fossil fuel resulting in negative health and environmental impacts. While admittedly modern biomass fueled energy systems benefit from newer technologies their use is still blamed for detrimental effects on social, economic and environmental aspects of human existence. No wonder then that in many parts of the world distributed renewable energy systems show promise in addressing some of the more important issues of energy access challenges, particularly energy poverty and fuel poverty; this is specifically evident in the global south through improved efficiency, effectiveness, access and quality of energy services. Nevertheless, understanding the complexities and subsequent structuring of energy poverty becomes a complex systems issue since energy technology plays a dual role in enhancing and inhibiting energy access. This paper, borrowing from systems thinking theory, applies a synergetic elements framework where the authors attempt to enhance the comprehension and structure of the wicked problem of energy poverty; this is done by developing a conceptual model. The paper continues by showing the critical role played by interactions between socio-technical system elements, notably those between soft and hard systems. This includes energy poverty depicted in multiple and complex synergetic subsystems, micro and macro elements, exogenous and internal barriers, control parameters and the environment.
References
- Abbott, R 2007, ‘Reductionism, emergence, and levels of abstractions’, arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.4198.
- Avila, N, Carvallo, JP, Shaw, B & Kammen, DM 2017, The energy challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa: A guide for advocates and policy makers.
- Barnes, DF, Khandker, SR & Samad, HA 2011, ‘Energy poverty in rural Bangladesh’, Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 2, Elsevier, pp. 894–904, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.014>.
- Bazilian, M, Nakhooda, S & Van De Graaf, T 2014, ‘Energy governance and poverty’, Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 1, No. 2014, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 217–225, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.006>.
- Beckerman, LP 2000, ‘Application of complex systems science to systems engineering’, Systems Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 96–102.
10.1002/1520-6858(2000)3:2<96::AID-SYS4>3.0.CO;2-7 Google Scholar
- Bhatia, M & Angelou, N 2015, Beyond Connections Energy Access Redefined, Sustainable Energy For All Global Tracking Framework Technical Report, viewed <http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Topics/EnergyandExtract/Beyond_Connections_Energy_Access_Redefined_Exec_ESMAP_2015.pdf>.
- Bhatia, M & Angelou, N 2014, ‘Capturing the Multi-Dimensionality of Energy Access’, Livewire, pp. 1–8.
- Bhattacharyya, S 2013, ‘Rural Electrification Through Decentralised Off-grid Systems in Developing Countries’, Green Energy and Technology, Vol. 116, pp. 13–39.
- Bhattacharyya, SC 2012, ‘Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis’, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 16, No. 3, International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved, pp. 260–271, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.002>.
- Birol, F 2018, ‘Energy Economics: A Place for Energy Poverty in the Agenda? Published by: International Association for Energy Economics Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41323106 Energy Economics: A Place for Energy Poverty in the A’, The Energy Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 1–6.
- Bouzarovski, S & Petrova, S 2015, ‘A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary’, Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 10, Elsevier Ltd, pp. 31–40, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007>.
- Bouzarovski, S & Tirado Herrero, S 2017, ‘The energy divide: Integrating energy transitions, regional inequalities and poverty trends in the European Union’, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 69–86.
- Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 0887, no. January, pp. 77–101.
- Buzar, S 2007, ‘The “hidden” geographies of energy poverty in post-socialism: Between institutions and households’, Geoforum, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 224–240.
- Clarke, V & Braun, V 2017, ‘Thematic analysis’, Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 3, Routledge, pp. 297–298, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613>.
- Cloke, J, Mohr, A & Brown, E 2017, ‘Imagining renewable energy: Towards a Social Energy Systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the Global South’, Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 31, no. October 2016, Elsevier, pp. 263–272, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.023>.
- Day, R, Walker, G & Simcock, N 2016, ‘Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework’, Energy Policy, Vol. 93, Elsevier, pp. 255–264.
- Franz, M, Visser, DI, Huppertz, A & Bloomfield, E 2015, Building Energy Access Markets. A Value Chain Analysis of Key Energy Market Systems, Escborn.
- González-Eguino, M 2015, ‘Energy poverty: An overview’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 47, pp. 377–385.
- Grevisse, F & Brynart, M 2011, ‘Energy poverty in Europe: Towards a more global understanding’, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy 2011 Summer Study, Vol. 71, pp. 537–549, viewed <http://proceedings.eceee.org/visabstrakt.php?event=1&doc=2-478-11>.
- Haken, H 1984, ‘Can synergetics be of use to management theory?’, Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems, Springer, pp. 33–41.
- Haken, H 1980, ‘Synergetics - Are cooperative phenomena governed by universal principles?’, Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 121–128.
- Haken, H & Portugali, J 2019, ‘ A synergetic perspective on urban scaling, urban regulatory focus and their interrelations’.
- Haken, H & Schiepek, G 2006, Synergetik in der Psychologie: Selbstorganisation verstehen und gestalten, Hogrefe Göttingen.
- Hills, J 2012, Getting the measure of fuel poverty. Final Report of the Fuel Poverty Review. Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion.
- Hughes, TP 1987, ‘The Evolution of Large Technological Systems’, The Social Construction of Technological Systems.
- IEA 2017, WEO-2017 Special Report: Energy Access Outlook, viewed <https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2017SpecialReport_EnergyAccessOutlook.pdf>.
- Kuhn, T 1977, ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’, The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp. 293–319.
- Levänen, J, Hossain, M, Lyytinen, T, Hyvärinen, A & Numminen, S 2015, ‘ Implications of Frugal Innovations on Sustainable Development: Evaluating Water and Energy Innovations’, pp. 1–17.
- Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, Mulrow, C, G⊘tzsche, PC, Ioannidis, JPA, Clarke, M, Devereaux, PJ, Kleijnen, J & Moher, D 2009, ‘The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.’, BMJ (Clinical research ed.), Vol. 339.
- Liening, A 2014, ‘Synergetics—Fundamental attributes of the theory of self-organization and its meaning for economics’, Modern Economy, Vol. 5, No. 08, Scientific Research Publishing, p. 841.
- Liening, A, Geiger, J-M, Kriedel, R & Wagner, W 2016, ‘Complexity and Entrepreneurship: Modeling the Process of Entrepreneurship Education with the Theory of Synergetics’, Complexity in Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Technology Research, Springer, pp. 93–115.
- Marechal, K & Lazaric, N 2010, ‘Overcoming inertia: Insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies’, Climate Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 103–119.
- McMichael, MH 2011, Social capital and the diffusion of energy-reducing innovations in UK households, UCL (University College London).
- Ngar-yin Mah, D, Wu, YY & Ronald Hills, P 2017, ‘Explaining the role of incumbent utilities in sustainable energy transitions: A case study of the smart grid development in China’, Energy Policy, Vol. 109, no. June 2016, Elsevier Ltd, pp. 794–806, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.059>.
- Nussbaumer, P, Bazilian, M & Modi, V 2012, ‘Measuring energy poverty: Focusing on what matters’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 1, Elsevier Ltd, pp. 231–243, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.150>.
- Practical Action 2017, ‘ Financing national energy access: a bottom up approach’.
- Prigogine, I 1989, ‘The philosophy of instability’, Futures, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 396–400.
- Pye, S & Dobbins, A 2015, ‘Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: analysis of policies and measures’, Policy Report-INSIGHT_E, no. May, p. 91.
- Qiao, J, Wang, M, Zhang, D, Ding, C, Wang, J & Xu, D 2017, ‘Synergetic Development Assessment of Urban River System Landscapes’, Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 12, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2145.
- QRS 2020, ‘ NVivo-12 plus’, https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/nvivo-12-plus.
- Richardson, KA 2007, ‘Systems Theory and Complexity: Part 4-The Evolution of Systems Thinking’, E:CO - Emergence: Complexity and Organization, Vol. 9, No. 1/2, pp. 163–180, viewed <http://www.kurtrichardson.com/Publications/Richardson_Midgley.pdf>.
- Rittel, HW & Webber, MM 1973, ‘2.3 planning problems are wicked’, Polity, Vol. 4, No. 155, pp. e169.
- Romero, JC, Linares, P & López, X 2018, ‘The policy implications of energy poverty indicators’, Energy Policy, Vol. 115, no. September 2017, Elsevier Ltd, pp. 98–108, viewed <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.054>.
- Saldana, J 2013, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers.
- Singh, R, Wang, X, Mendoza, JC & Ackom, EK 2015, ‘Electricity (in)accessibility to the urban poor in developing countries’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 339–353.
- Sovacool, BK, Cooper, C, Bazilian, M, Johnson, K, Zoppo, D, Clarke, S, Eidsness, J, Crafton, M, Velumail, T & Raza, HA 2012, ‘What moves and works: Broadening the consideration of energy poverty’, Energy Policy, Vol. 42, Elsevier, pp. 715–719, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.007>.
- Thomson, H, Snell, C & Liddell, C 2016, ‘Fuel poverty in the European Union: a concept in need of definition?’, People Place and Policy Online, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 5–24, viewed <http://extra.shu.ac.uk/ppp-online/fuel-poverty-in-the-european-union-a-concept-in-need-of-definition/>.
- Tolstoy, AD, Lesovik, VS, Glagolev, ES & Krymova, AI 2018, ‘Synergetics of hardening construction systems’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, p. 32056.
- Ürge-Vorsatz, D & Tirado Herrero, S 2012, ‘Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation’, Energy Policy, Vol. 49, pp. 83–90.
- Waddock, S 2013, ‘The Wicked Problems of Global Sustainability The WIcked ProBleMS of GloBAl SuSTAInABIlITy need WIcked (Good) leAderS And WIcked (Good) collABorATIve SoluTIonS’, Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, Vol. 1, pp. 91–111.
- Waddock, S, Meszoely, GM, Waddell, S & Dentoni, D 2015, ‘The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 28, No. 6, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 993–1012.
- Wang, R, Li, F, Hu, D & Larry Li, B 2011, ‘Understanding eco-complexity: Social-Economic-Natural Complex Ecosystem approach’, Ecological Complexity, Vol. 8, No. 1, Elsevier B.V., pp. 15–29, viewed <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.11.001>.
- Webb, SB 2008, Public sector reform: What works and why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank support, The World Bank.
- Wilcox, M, Waters, L, Wanjiru, H, Pueyo, A, Palit, D & Rahul Sharma, K 2015, ‘ Utilising Electricity Access for Poverty Reduction’, pp. 1–105.
- Wilkinson, P, Smith, KR, Joffe, M & Haines, A 2007, ‘A global perspective on energy: health effects and injustices’, Lancet, Vol. 370, No. 9591, pp. 965–978.